DHEERAJ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/10024/2025 · 2025-10-30
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175035 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175035 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10024 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing at some length, submits that he does not want to press this petition, therefore, the same may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to avail remedy of anticipatory bail / bail, to which, there is no objection by learned A.G.A.
3. In view of above, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. October 30, 2025 kanhaiya Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pragati Gautam, Aakil Khan, Jamal Ahamad Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Dheeraj .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KANHAIYA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench