Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 175032 (ALL)

BEAUTY SINGH v. STATE OF U.P THRU. PRIN. SECY., BAL VIKAS SEWA EVAM PUSHTAHAR VIBHAG LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/12973/2025 · 2025-11-11

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12973 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties to appoint petitioner on the post of Anganwadi Worker in the center concerned. Learned State Counsel has been provided written instructions dated 07.11.2025 which is taken on record and on that basis, submits that petitioner was placed at Sl.No.2 of the select list under BPL category, but since the person indicated at first preference has already been appointed elsewhere, petitioner's candidature for appointment is under active consideration for which appropriate directions and orders shall be passed shortly. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the authorities concerned are directed to take a final decision with regard to petitioner's grievance, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction(s), petition stands disposed of. November 11, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Pratap Singh, Arpit Singh, Pawan Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Beauty Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy., Bal Vikas Sewa Evam Pushtahar Vibhag Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench