Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 175028 (ALL)

MOHD. ARSHAD KHAN (IN FIR ARSHAD KHAN) AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME AFFAIRS AND OTHERS

/11794/2025 · 2025-12-15

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11794 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Prashant Vikram Singh on behalf of respondent no. 4 today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State-respondents and Sri Prashant Vikram Singh appearing for respondent no. 4. 3. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing of impugned FIR No. 409 of 2025 under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of BNS, 2023, P.S. Raunahi, District Ayodhya/Faizabad and not to arrest the petitioners pursuant to the impugned FIR. 3. At the very outset, learned AGA on the basis of instructions dated 12.12.2025 sent by Sri Alok Kumar Yadav, Sub Inspector, Police Station Raunahi, District Ayodhya/Faizabad states that during investigation Sections 109(1) and 117(2) of BNS have been added. 4. Upon the same being pointed out, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he does not intend to press the writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) December 15, 2025 AKK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Divya Tripathi, Prashant Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Ramesh Kumar Yadav Mohd. Arshad Khan (In Fir Arshad Khan) And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Affairs And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench