ANIL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/6004/2024 · 2025-11-12
Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175017 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 175017 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6004 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. has pointed out that in the instant case, the investigation has already been concluded, and the final report has been filed in favour of the accused. As such the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid fact. In view of the aforesaid statement, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 12, 2025 Arvind Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Surya Prakash Singh, Suraindra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Anil .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench