HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6708 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner to permit him to submit two sureties and one personal bond for all six cases from the petitioner and petitioner has been granted bail in all cases by the court below. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in all six cases. He next submitted that in all the cases registered against the petitioner, he has been granted bail by the court below. He says that the petitioner is very poor person and not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders. It is further submitted that the details of cases registered against petitioner in District-Lucknow are as follows:- (i) FIR No. 476 of 2025, Police Station P.G.I. and District - Lucknow. (ii) FIR No. 258 of 2025, Police Station - Krishna Nagar and District Lucknow. (iii) FIR No. 782 of 2025, Police Station Sushant Golf City and District Lucknow. (iv) FIR No. 659 of 2025, Police Station Sushant Golf City and District Lucknow. (v) FIR No. 523 of 2025, Police Station Sushant Golf City and District Lucknow. (vi) FIR No. 837 of 2025, Police Station - Sushant Golf City and District Lucknow. Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Singh, Gajendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Vaseer Ali .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit. In view of the facts and circumstances as well as rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties, the present application stands disposed of finally in the light law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and the Court below is directed to execute the personal bond of Rs. 20,000/- in every case and produce two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court/Magistrate concerned in one case which shall hold good for rest of the cases. November 19, 2025 Jyoti/- A227 No. 6708 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench