HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7769 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned AGA has pointed out that investigation in the instant case has already been concluded and charge sheet has been submitted and, as such, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum at appropriate stage. November 15, 2025 KU Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deepak Kumar Pandey, Paritosh Shukla, Santosh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Iqbal Ahmad (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Vishal Mishra (In Fir Vishal) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench