IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.9837 of 2025 Date of Decision: 19.06.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Meena Kumari Sharma ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with order dated 16.06.2025 (Annexure P-5), whereby representation having been filed by the petitioner in terms of order dated 16.05.2025 passed by this Court in CWP No. 8101 of 2025 titled as Meena Kumari VS. State of Himachal Pradesh & others, whereby direction was issued to the respondents to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, coupled with the fact she is due to retire within two years, came to be dismissed, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings, praying therein to set aside the aforesaid order. 2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused material available on record vis-à-vis order laid challenge in the instant proceedings, this Court finds no illegality in the same. 3. Since it is quite apparent from the aforesaid order that date of birth of the petitioner, as recorded in the service records, is 29.06.1969 and she is due to retire beyond the period of two years i.e. 30.06.2027, no illegality can be said to have been committed by the respondents, while passing impugned orders. 4. In view of the above, present petition fails and dismissed accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. June 19, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (sunil) Judge 2