Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174942 (ALL)

AJAI DIXIT AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER

A482/9385/2025 · 2025-11-13

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9385 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Sri Ravindra Kumar Rai, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:- "Wherefore it is most respectfully prayed that this Honble court may graciously be pleased to Quash/set aside the impugned summoning order dated 18/01/2016 contained as Annexure No.1 to this petition and the impugned Chargesheet No- 88/ 2015 dated 30/06/2015 contained in Annexure No.-2 to this petition along with entire proceedings as well as all consequential proceedings in Case No-229/2016 (State Versus Ajai Dixit and Others) arising out of Crime No.-295/2014, U/S 498A /323/504/506/406 IPC and 3/4 D.P Act P.S Bazarkhala Lucknow Lodged on 08/11/2014 which is pending before the Honble Court of ACJM-IV, Lucknow." 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No. 4 to the application. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prashant Kumar, Mridula Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ajai Dixit And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. November 13, 2025 Raj A482 No. 9385 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench