Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr. MMO No. 961 of 2022 Decided on: 22.5.2025 Kabirudeen Farhan & anr.
… Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & ors.
…Respondents _____________________________ ______________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge Whether approved for reporting? ___________________________________________________ For the Petitioners : Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Tejasvi Sharma, Addl. A.G., for respondent No. 1/State. Mr. Imran Khan and Mr. Javed Khan,
Advocates,
for respondents No. 2 and 3. Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 4. Virender Singh, Judge (oral) Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the matter has been settled between the parties.
2. In view of said settlement, learned counsel for the petitioner does not intend to press the present petition. The settlement has been placed on record. As such, the present petition is dismissed, as not pressed, in terms of the settlement.
2 Needless to say that the parties shall be governed by the terms and conditions of the compromise. The pending application(s), if any, are also disposed of. (Virender Singh) Judge 22.5.2025 Kalpana