HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3507 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Learned A.G.A. files counter affidavit on behalf of State. The same is taken on record. 2. Heard, Sri Suraya Prakash, learned counsel, holding the brief, appearing for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The office report dated 28.11.2025 reveals that opposite party no.2 has been sufficiently served, despite sufficiency of service, none appeared for opposite party no.2 to contest the appeal. 4. Learned counsel submits that the F.I.R. has been lodged by the victim- opposite party no.2 for the offence under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3(1) (द)(ध) of SC/ST Act in Case Crime No.279 of 2024 Police Station Tambaur, District Sitapur. The informant has alleged in the F.I.R that at about 1.00 p.m. on 30.06.2024 four persons including the appellant hurled caste related abuses and wielded cane and lathi blow on informant a her husband and one Amrish, the son of her brother-in-law. The dispute was plucking of mangoes. Four persons have been mentioned in the F.I.R.The victim suffered simple injuries. After investigation charge-sheet is submitted against two persons. There is no separate role assigned to the appellant. The co-accused, Upendra has already been granted bail by Exclusive Court of SC/ST Act, hence prayed that bail may be granted to the accused-appellant. 5. Learned A.G.A. opposes the bail application and submits that the accused- appellant has been charge-sheeted. Both the injured have named the Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Arsh Bugga Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Sagar @ Ramsagar .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) accused-appellant in their statements. The injuries on the person of Amrish were kept under observation, hence, he seeks rejection of bail. 6. Considering the injuries on the person of injured, no specific role of the accused-appellant, the appellant shall be enlarged on bail and the appeal deserves to be allowed. 7. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. 8. The order dated 15.10.2025 passed by Special Judge, (SC/ST Act), Sitapur in Bail Application No.334 of 2025 (Sagar Versus State of U.P. ) arising out of Case Crime No.279 of 2025 under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3(1)(द)(ध) of SC/ST Act Police Station Tambaur, District Sitapur, is set aside. 9. The appellant, Sagar @ Ramsagar involved in Case Crime No.279 of 2025 under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3(1) (द)(ध) of SC/ST Act Police Station Tambaur, District Sitapur shall be released on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned. December 1, 2025 MN/- CRLA No. 3507 of 2025 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAHENDRA NATH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench