HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12050 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. The accused-applicants Munnan @ Mannan and Kalpu seeks bail in Case Crime No.82 of 2025 under Section 3/5/8 Cow Slaughter Act, Police Station Maharajganj Tarai, District Balrampur. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated. He has not been arrested from the place of occurrence. Their name have surfaced in the confessional statement of the co-accused persons. Co-accused Sonu Khan, from whom 15 kg beef is alleged to have been recovered, has been granted bail by this Court, a copy of which has been annexed as Annexure-2 to the bail application. The other co-accused persons, Saukat Ali and Fakhruddin, have also been granted bail by this Court vide orders dated 25.11.2025, 26.11.2025, and 25.11.2025 passed in Bail Application Nos. 11778 of 2025, 11336 of 2025, and 11673 of 2025, respectively. The applicants seek parity with the bail orders of the said co-accused persons. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicants of fleeing away after being released on bail or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicants are enlarged on bail, they shall not misuse the liberty of bail. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicants but Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Himanshu Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Munnan @ Mannam And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Sectt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) could not dispute that it is a case of parity. I have considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties as well as perused the record. On due consideration to the bail orders of the co-accused persons, named above, and the facts that the applicants are in jail since 19.9.2025 and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicants Munnan @ Mannan and Kaplu, involved in the aforesaid FIR/Case crime number, be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicants shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicants shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. Any other condition(s) which the trial court/concerned court may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case, may also be imposed. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. December 4, 2025 Madhu D.R/P.S BAIL No. 12050 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench