APHC010238732009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL Between: Devarinti @ Mandemvaripalle Jyothy @ Maheswari, D/o.Pandipati Anjappa, W/o.Devarinti @ Mandemvaripalle Ganesh AND Devarinti @ Mandemvaripalle Ganesh, S/ Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondent The Court made the following Though the matter is listed under the caption “For Dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. The learned counsel for the respondent–husband states that during the pendency of the appeal, the respondent died. Be that as it may. A behalf of the appellant, we are compelled to dismiss the matter for non prosecution. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) DAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.926 of 2009 Devarinti @ Mandemvaripalle Jyothy @ Maheswari, D/o.Pandipati Anjappa, W/o.Devarinti @ Mandemvaripalle Ganesh … Petitioner Devarinti @ Mandemvaripalle Ganesh, S/o.Gopalu … Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.R.Radha Krishna Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : Mr.Mahedeva Kantrigala The Court made the following JUDGMENT: (per NJS,J) Though the matter is listed under the caption “For Dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. The learned counsel for husband states that during the pendency of the appeal, the respondent died. Be that as it may. As there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, we are compelled to dismiss the matter for non [3526] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO D/o.Pandipati Anjappa, W/o.Devarinti @ Mandemvaripalle Ganesh Petitioner Respondent R.Radha Krishna Reddy Though the matter is listed under the caption “For Dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. The learned counsel for husband states that during the pendency of the appeal, s there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, we are compelled to dismiss the matter for non– 2 2. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J _____________________________________ TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO,J July 30, 2025 vasu