Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174900 (ALL)

VIRENDRA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/10221/2025 · 2025-12-04

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10221 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Mr. Arvind Kumar Tiwari, learned Advocate has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party nos.2 to 4, which is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s), learned Counsel for the opposite party nos.2 to 4, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. The instant application has been filed for the following main relief:- "For the facts, reasons and circumstances stated in the accompanying affidavit, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the entire criminal proceeding of (state Vs Virendra and Others) in S.T. No. 42/2015 pending in court of Learned Additional Session Judge/ Special Judge, S.C./S.T. Act, Shrawasti initiated at the petitioners in pursuance of impugned charge sheet dated 18.02.2014, submitted in Case Crime No. 12A/2014, U/s 324, 323, 504, 506 & 427 I.P.C. and 3(1)(x) SC/ST Act Police Station Kotwali Bhinga, District Shrawasti, in terms of compromise deed 07.11.2025" Learned counsel for the applicant(s) submitted that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and have entered into a compromise. As such, keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in this regard, the proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Trial Court as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Considering the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of finally in following terms:- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chetan Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Virendra And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) (i) The parties to the proceedings i.e. S.T. No. 42/2015 (supra), shall appear before the concerned Court within six weeks' from today and file the compromise. (ii) If the parties appear before the concerned Court in terms of above, the concerned Court shall proceed to verify the compromise between the parties to the proceedings and prepare a report to the same effect and the original compromise deed be made part of record. (iii) The concerned Court shall conclude the process of verification of compromise within two weeks' from the date of production of copy of this order. (iv) The concerned Court shall permit the parties to the proceedings to obtain the certified copy of the report as well as compromise deed. (v) It shall be open to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. (vi) Office is directed to provide original compromise, if any, to the Counsel for the applicant(s), after retaining its photocopy on record. It is for the purposes for its verification by the concerned court. (vii) For a period of eight weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case. December 4, 2025 Jyoti/- A482 No. 10221 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench