Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17490 (KAR)

SRI CHETHAN KUMAR T P v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/1977/2023 · 2025-04-15

Mohammad Nawaz

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:15516 CRL.P No. 1977 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1977 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. CHETHAN KUMAR T.P., (AS PER FIR WRONG NAME GIVEN AS CHETHANA GOWDA), S/O PUTTASINAPPA K R, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/AT NO.30/1, 2ND CROSS, JAI JAWAN NAGAR, SUBBAIYANAPALYA, BEHIND GANESHA TEMPLE ROAD, M.S. NAGAR POST, BENGALURU – 560 033. 2. SRI. MANJUNATHA P S/O LATE PAPANNA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT KANNURU VILLAGE AND POST, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK – 562 149. 3. SRI. MARIYAPPA Y.N., S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT YARAHALLI VILLAGE, SHIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT – 562 105. 4. SRI. MUNIVENKATAPPA, S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT SIDDAPURA VILLAGE, Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:15516 CRL.P No. 1977 of 2023 KUNDALAGURKI, SHIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT – 562 105. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VIJAYA SHEKARA GOWDA V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY DIBBURAHALLI POLICE STATION, DIBBURAHALLI, SHIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT – 562 105. REPRESENTED BY S.P.P., HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE – 560 001. 2. SRI. SANTOSH KUMAR S/O ESHWARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT THIMMANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, SHIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT – 562 105. MOBILE NO.6361993981. …RESPONDENTS (BY MS.ASMA KOUSER, ADDL. S.P.P., FOR R1; SRI.UMESH P.B., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS IN CRIME NO.0008/2023 REGISTERED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DIBBURAHALLI P.S. AS PER ANNEXURE J AND K ON THE BASIS OF COMPLAINT LODGED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 323, 324, 341, 504, 506, 34 OF IPC AND U/S 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) OF SCHEDULE CASTE AND SCHEDULE TRIBES (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) 2015 AMENDED ACT AS PER ANNEXURE J AND K PENDING ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT CHIKKABALLAPURA. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:15516 CRL.P No. 1977 of 2023 ORAL ORDER Petitioners are aggrieved by the registration of FIR against them in Crime No.8/2023 at Dibburahalli Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 341, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015. 2. The first informant by name Santhosh Kumar has alleged that the land bearing Sy.No.53/2 measuring 2 acres 34 guntas of Thimmanayakanahalli Village belonged to his father Eshwarappa and since his father was unwell, they decided to sell the said property through a broker by name Mariyappa S/o Narayanappa. The said broker brought Munivenkatappa and introduced him to the complainant and later he introduced Chethan Gowda and Manjunath, to whom a GPA was executed. However, some quarrel took place between the complainant and the parties to whom GPA was executed regarding construction of a compound wall and in this background on 21.01.2023 at about 7.00 p.m., when the complainant was proceeding on a two wheeler towards Dibburahalli, accused- Chethan Gowda waylaid his two wheeler, abused him in filthy - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:15516 CRL.P No. 1977 of 2023 language referring to his caste and assaulted with iron rod on his head and left hand etc. 3. It is the contention of the learned counsel for petitioners that the entire allegations are false and the complaint against them was lodged as a counter blast to the complaint lodged by petitioner No.2-Manjunatha.P. He contended that a case in Crime No.7/2023 was registered at Dibburahalli Police Station against respondent No.2 herein for offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 114, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC on 19.01.2023 and after three days, present complaint was lodged making false allegations. He further contended that on account of civil dispute, false case was registered against the petitioners and therefore, the proceedings initiated against the petitioners is an abuse of process of the Court. 4. It is not in dispute that a case in Crime No.7/2023 was registered against respondent No.2 and two others at Dibburahalli Police Station on 19.01.2023. The said case was registered on a complaint lodged by Manjunatha.P.-petitioner No.2 herein. Merely because a case was registered a couple of - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:15516 CRL.P No. 1977 of 2023 days earlier itself, is not a ground to assume at this stage that respondent No.2 herein lodged a false complaint against the petitioners. The case is still under investigation. The prerogative of the police to conduct investigation into the allegations made in the complaint and to file an appropriate Report, cannot be interfered with. 5. Petitioners can bring to the notice of the Investigation Officer regarding all transaction between the parties. The Investigation Officer after conducting a fair investigation, shall file an appropriate Report. In the guise of investigation, he shall not harass the petitioners. With the above observation, petition stands disposed of. Consequently, pending I.As, if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (MOHAMMAD NAWAZ) JUDGE SMJ, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3