Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174895 (ALL)

SHAMSHEER AHMAD AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO AND 3 OTHERS

/10736/2025 · 2025-11-19

Manjive Shukla, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10736 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Sri Amit Arora, Advocate has appeared on behalf of respondent no.4. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation/application dated 20.07.2025 filed by the petitioners. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that raising his grievances the petitioners have filed the aforesaid representation/application before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.2/District Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar may be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No.2/District Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manish Mani Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Amit Arora Shamsheer Ahmad And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from date. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. November 19, 2025 Ashutosh WRIC No. 10736 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench