IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Pet. No.882 of 2025 Decided on: 8th August, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Satya Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.5. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned Additional Advocate General submits that compliance affidavit has been filed by the respondents. A copy of the same was produced during hearing of the case. The same reflects that in terms of the judgment in question, the respondents had considered the case of the petitioner and office order was issued on 24.06.2025, rejecting the claim of the petitioner on the ground that her husband’s total service even after taking into consideration the law laid down in Sunder Singh Versus The State of 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2 Himachal Pradesh & Ors.2, Balo Devi & others Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others3 and Roop Lal Versus State of H.P. & Others4 does not go beyond eight years. 2. In view of the compliance affidavit, this execution petition to stand disposed of. Liberty is, however, reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law for the redressal of her grievances including against the office order dated 24.06.2025. Jyotsna Rewal Dua August 08, 2025 Judge Mukesh 2 Civil Appeal No.6309 of 2017, decided on 08.03.2018 3 Civil Appeal No.4792 of 2022, decided on 18.07.2022 4 LPA No.196 of 2022, decided on 11.10.2023