Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174887 (ALL)

SHARDA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/11296/2025 · 2025-12-01

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11296 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. Heard. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that at the time when the petitioner was doing construction in her house, the police authorities have reached and stopped the construction work. Responding learned AGA on the basis of instructions sent by Sri S.P.Singh, Sub Inspector, Police Station- Lalganj, District- Pratapgarh dated 30.11.2025 states that neither the police authorities have interfered in the construction of the petitioner nor the police authorities have ever reached the house of the petitioner. The aforesaid statement of learned AGA is recorded and the writ petition is consigned to record. December 1, 2025 Pachhere/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suman Lata, Anita Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Sharda Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench