- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3864 WP No. 16191 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 16191 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. G.M.ANITHA W/O LATE G.R.RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/AT NO.436, 1ST WARD, B.M.ROAD, MAKHAN GOORAMARANAHALLI, CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 116. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAGADEESH GOUD PATIL., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: MANGALURU RETAIL REGIONAL OFFICE, HINDUSTHAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD., 1ST FLOOR, DEO GRATIS BUILDING, CHILLIBMI, URVA STORES, MANGALURU-575 006. BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. DEEPU., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.PRAMOD., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3864 WP No. 16191 of 2019 ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.Deepu., counsel on behalf of Sri.B.Pramod., for the respondent has appeared in preson. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 22.01.2025, on that day, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner, the petition was ordered to be listed on 28.01.2025. The petition is listed today. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 4