Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174871 (ALL)

OM PRAKASH TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. FINANCE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/12757/2025 · 2025-11-03

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12757 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner(s), learned State Counsel for the opposite parties 1, 3 and 4 and Mr. Jogendra Nath Verma learned counsel for opposite party No.2. 2. Petition has been filed challenging provision to the extent stating restoration period of 15 years in the U.P. Civil Pension (Commutation) Rules 1941 as amended by Government Orders and seeking restoration of the commuted pension after expiry of 10 years 11 months or at best 11 years instead of 15 years as provided in the relevant Government Orders dated 23.07.1987, 06.12.1990 and 08.12.2008. 3. Learned counsel for the parties admit that the case of the petitioner(s) is squarely covered by judgment of this Court in WRIT - A No. - 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko 3 Others) and other connected matters decided on 28.05.2025. 4. Considering aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of finally providing that petitioner(s) of this writ petition shall also be entitled to benefit of judgment rendered in WRIT - A No. - 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko 3 Others). November 3, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arpan Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Raj Kumar Upadhyaya (R.K.Upadhyaya) (Manish Mathur,J.) Om Prakash Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Finance Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench