RAMVATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/11041/2025 · 2025-11-25
Manjive Shukla, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174860 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174860 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11041 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation/application made under Section 67 (1) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, dated 05.12.2024 filed by the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising her grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation/application before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided.
4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the Tehsildar, Tehsil- Mankapur, District-Gonda should be directed to decide the proceedings pending before him under Section 67(1) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, if any.
5. Accordingly, the Tehsildar, Tehsil-Mankapur, District-Gonda is directed to decide the proceedings pending before him, if any, under Section 67 (1) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. November 25, 2025 akhilesh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Ramvati .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AKHILESHWAR KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench