Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174857 (ALL)

CHAITANYA VIRENDRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

/4600/2025 · 2025-11-27

Brij Raj Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4600 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. In view of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to opposite party no.2 is dispensed with. 2. This application has been filed seeking quashing of the summoning order dated 19.7.2024 passed in Case no.13503 of 2023 by the Civil Judge (Junior Division)/FTC-Second/Judicial Magistrate, Gonda as well as the entire proceedings of Case No.13503 of 2023, under section-138 of the NI Act P.S- Kotwali Nagar, District Gonda. 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press this application on merits. He has further submitted that the applicant is ready to cooperate in the proceedings and will appear before the trial court within three weeks from today. It is submitted that there is chance of mediation between the parties. 4. A perusal of the impugned complaint and the summoning order does not disclose any such manifest illegality or jurisdictional error or an abuse of process of Court so as to call for interference by this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. It is a case under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act where an offence of dishonour of a cheque is involved. This Court, therefore, declines to quash the proceedings. 5. It will, however, be open to the applicant to appear before the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Tarun Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Chaitanya Virendra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Magistrate and pray for compounding the case in accordance with the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in Damodar S. Prabhu vs. Sayed Babalal H., 2010 (5) SCC 663. In case, the applicant appears before the Magistrate within three weeks from today through counsel and moves an application seeking to compound the offences, the Magistrate shall dispose of the application in accordance with law within three months bearing in mind the relevant directions in Damodar S. Prabhu (supra) after providing opportunity of hearing to all parties concerned. If the orders made do not work to bring proceedings to an end in accordance with law, the trial shall proceed and brought to its logical conclusion, where the applicant will have all defence open to her under the law. 6. For a period of three months, no coercive steps shall be adopted against the applicant in respect of the aforesaid case. 7. The application is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid orders. November 27, 2025 Sachin A482 No. 4600 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench