ALOK PRAJAPATI @ ALOK KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO
BAIL/10551/2025 · 2025-10-30
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174856 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174856 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10551 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA, and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 149 of 2025, under Sections 87, 69, 115(2), 352, 351(3) 127(2) B.N.S., P.S. Malipur, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of the FIR it was alleged that daughter of the informant informed him that on false pretext of marriage physical relations were formed with her by the applicant. Somewhat similar statement was given by the victim in her statement recorded under Section 180, B.N.S.S., however, she stated that for the last three years she used to talk to the applicant. The tentative age of the victim is around 19 years. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the said statement of the victim as also the fact that the relationship existed for substantial period of time and age of the victim is about 19 years, coupled with the fact that the medical report of the victim does not corroborate the allegations, the applicant, who is in custody since 28/07/2025 and has no criminal history, without commenting upon the merits of the case, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Atul Kumar Yadav, Anoop Vajpayee Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Alok Prajapati @ Alok Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Let the applicant Alok Prajapati alias Alok Kumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
October 30, 2025 A.Nigam BAIL No. 10551 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench