HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 16433 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. November 27, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sunil Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G., Prabhat Narain, Puneet Chandra, R.K. Maurya, Rakesh Chandra Tewari, Rakesh Kumar Maurya (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Mohd. Mubashshir Khan .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru Secy.Ministry Of Industrial And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench