FAUZDAR VERMA @ RAM RAKHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
/11605/2025 · 2025-11-26
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174851 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174851 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11605 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.102 of 2025, under Section 105 of BNS, Police Station Intiyathok, District Gonda.
3. It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that on the same allegation, the co-accused Shesh Narayan Mishra and Anil Kumar have been enlarged on bail by this Court vide orders dated 13.11.2025.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the fact that the allegations against the applicant to be similar to the co-accused, who has been enlarged on bail and adopting the same reasoning contained in the order dated 13.11.2025 coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 28.10.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Fauzdar Verma @ Ram Rakhan be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Fauzdar Verma @ Ram Rakhan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 26, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 11605 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench