Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17485 (UTT)

VIKKI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1718/2025 · 2025-12-18

G Narendar, Subhash Upadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:11358-DB HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G.NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY Writ Petition Criminal No. 1718 of 2025 18th December, 2025 Vikki and another -----------Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ----------Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. G.D.Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. J.S.Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General, assisted by Mr. Rakesh Joshi, Brief Holder for the State. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT: (per Mr. G. Narendar C.J.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. It is submitted that both the petitioners belong to the same faith, and that the petitioners developed a liking for each other, which has ended in marriage, and now both the petitioners are living together. Since the family members of the second petitioner are against this marriage, they are giving out 1 2025:UHC:11358-DB threats to kill both the petitioners. Petitioners submit that they are facing stiff resistance, and they seriously apprehend threat to their life and limb from the family members of the first petitioner, and hence they are before this Court praying for protection. 3. The documents on record reveal that both the petitioners are major, and it is also submitted by the counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are living together and intend to marry. They have already made a representation before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Udham Singh Nagar. Both the petitioners have registered their live-in-relationship on 13.12.2025 and the registration no. is LR-UKUCC25000000146. 4. In that view of the matter, and in view of the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs State of U.P. and another, (2006) 5 SCC 475, the petitioners have made out a case for grant of protection. 5. The Station House Officer, Police Station Dinesh Pur, District Udham Singh Nagar is directed to assess the threat, if any, to the life and limb of the petitioners, and provide necessary protection, if it is found that there is a threat to the life and limb of the petitioners. The SHO is further directed to summon the 2 2025:UHC:11358-DB private respondents, and such other persons, who are inimically placed towards the marriage of the petitioners, and counsel them, in accordance with law. 6. The writ petition stands ordered accordingly. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. (G. NARENDAR, C.J.) (SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 18.12.2025 Kaushal 3