IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.5222 of 2020 Decided on: 31st July, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mahender Singh …..Petitioner Versus H.P. State Forest Development Corporation and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Kunal Mehta, Advocate vice Mr. Abhishek Nagta, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge CMP No.18081 of 2025 Allowed and disposed of. CWP No.5222 of 2020 With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 2. Petitioner is serving in the respondent-H.P. State Forest Development Corporation and has prayed for direction to the respondents to grant him work charge 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 status from the date he completed eight years of service with all incidental benefits. 3. Learned vice counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved in the writ petition and the relief prayed for by the petitioner are now covered by the decision rendered by the Hon’ble Apex Court in The State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Versus Surajmani & Anr.2. The respondent-Corporation was also the appellant before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in some of the connected matters. Learned vice counsel further submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case the respondents are directed to examine his case in light of the aforesaid judgment within a fixed time schedule. Learned vice counsel appearing for the respondents is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in accordance with law laid down in Surajmani2 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within 2 Civil Appeal No.1595 of 2025, decided alongwith connected civil appeals on 06.02.2025 3 six weeks from today. Copy of the order so passed, be also communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua July 31, 2025 Judge Mukesh