Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174841 (ALL)

HASEEB v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/8387/2025 · 2025-10-31

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8387 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.43 of 2025 under sections 64(2) (da), 61(2), 352, 351(3) BNS and section 3(2)(V), 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dha) SC/ST Act and section 5(j)/6 & 5(L)/6 POCSO Act, PS. Navin Modern Police Station, District Shrawasti. 3. The FIR in question was lodged alleging that the applicant had formed physical relations on the false pretext of marriage. The age of the victim was disclosed as 19 years. It was also stated she was carrying a fetus of eight months. A similar statement was recorded under section 183 BNSS. The father of the informant has given a statement that the victim has married elsewhere. 4. Considering the fact that the relationship continued over a span of two years and the tentative age of the victim is around 19 years, as per the FIR, the applicant who is in custody since 24.06.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled for the bail. Thus the bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicant Haseeb be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arvind Kumar Tiwari, Ramakar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Haseeb .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 31, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 8387 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench