RAJEEV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/10773/2025 · 2025-11-13
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174840 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174840 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10773 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.59 of 2025 under sections 332(B), 64(1) BNS and section 3/4 POCSO Act, P.S. Uchauliya, District Lakhimpur Kheri.
3. The FIR in question was lodged alleging that the daughter of the informant aged about 15 years was alone at home when the applicant came and wrong was committed on her. Similar statement was given under section 180 and 183 BNSS, however, thereafter the applicant recorded the statement wherein he stated that both of them were meeting from one year and the father had seen them in objectionable position. The medical on record does not corroborate the allegation of use of force etc.
4. Considering the medical report on record and the fact that the tentative age of the victim is around 15 years, however, there is no definite document with regard to the exact age of the victim, the applicant who is in custody since 09.03.2025 is entitled to bail. Thus the bail application is allowed.
5. Let the applicant Rajeev be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Subodh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajeev .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 13, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 10773 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench