HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6875 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondent is dispensed with. Learned counsel for the petitioner-applicant has pressed the application for impleadment seeking impleadment of Sub Divisional Officer, Kunda, Pratapgarh as respondent no. 3 in the memo of writ petition. The application is allowed. Let necessary impleadment be carried out during course of the day. 3. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India prayer has been made for direction to the Sub Divisional Officer, Kunda, District - Pratapgarh for expeditious disposal of Appeal No. T 202502570116823 - Pravin Kumar Vs. Anshul Gupta, under Section 35(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case Sub Divisional Officer, Kunda, District - Pratapgarh, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the Court concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of Appeal No. T 202502570116823 - Pravin Kumar Vs. Anshul Gupta, under Section 35(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the Court/Authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioner, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the Court concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. December 3, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Praveen Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Anshul Gupta And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench