HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11653 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. Heard Shri Sandeep Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated 16.07.2025 (Annexure-1) filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent/District Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent/District Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. December 2, 2025 akhilesh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sandeep Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Shiv Diwakar Dwivedi .....Petitioner(s) District Magistrate, Distt. Ambedkar Nagar .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AKHILESHWAR KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench