DINESH PRATAP SINGH AND 8 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF NAGAR VIKAS URBAN DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND ANOTHER
/14450/2025 · 2025-12-15
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174816 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174816 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14450 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer:
"i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS thereby commanding / directing the opposite parties to treat the petitioners as permanent and confirmed employees of the department since the date of their initial appointment and provide all consequential service benefits including pension by counting their entire length of their services rendered into the department as qualifying service for all purposes forthwith. ii) to pass any other suitable order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the interest of justice. iii) to award the cost of the writ petition."
3. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the ends of justice would sub-serge if, this Court allows the petitioners to move a fresh representation before the respondent no.2 and direct him to consider and decide the same within the time frame fixed by this Court.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Tripathi, Pandit Venktesh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Dinesh Pratap Singh And 8 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Nagar Vikas Urban Development Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s)
5. Be that as it may, without going into the merits of the case, petitioners are granted liberty to move a fresh representation before the respondent no.2 within a period of 15 days. If any such representation is moved raising their claim, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same, expeditiously in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date the certified copy of this order is produced before him.
6. With the aforesaid view, the writ petition stands disposed off. December 15, 2025 V. Sinha WRIA No. 14450 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench