HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10216 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s) and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed by the applicant(s) for the following main relief(s):- "The petitioner named above most respectfully begs to submit that for the facts, reasons and circumstances stated in the accompanying affidavit, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the Charge-sheet No. 370/2020, dated 11.08.2020, under sections 504, 507 I.P.C., & Section 3(1) (Dha) SC/ST Act, Police Station - Inayatnagar, District - Faizabad / Ayodhya, as well as Summoning order dated 07.09.2020 passed by Learned Special Judge (SC/ST) Act, Ayodhya, in Special S.T. No. 203/2020, 'State Vs Dinesh Kumar Yadav', arising out of Case Crime No. 0414/2020, under section 504, 507 I.P.C., & Section 3(1) (Dha) SC/ST Act, Police Station Inayatnagar, District Faizabad/ Ayodhya." 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant(s) submitted that at this stage, he is confining his prayer to seek the benefit of the judgment(s) passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 for which liberty may be given to the applicant(s) and liberty may also be given to the applicant(s) to prefer a discharge application before the court below and the same may be directed to be decided expeditiously. 4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant(s). 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. 6. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra) , this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today, they would not take any coercive action against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case. It is made clear that in this regard, no application shall be entertained. December 4, 2025/Jyoti/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Seraj Ahmad Khan, Shafaq Fatima Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dinesh Kumar Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) A482 No. 10216 of 2025 2 Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench