Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1748 (UTT)

MR.ASHOK KUMAR v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

WPMS/1124/2003 · 2025-06-03

Ashish Naithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:4458 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS No. 1124 of 2003 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Krishan Kant Joshi, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. D. Barthwal, learned counsel for the petitioner no. 1. 2. Mr. G.S. Negi, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Mr. V.K. Kohli, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Kanti Ram Sharma, learned counsel for respondent nos. 3/1 to 3/3. 4. Despite being afforded sufficient opportunities, the petitioner failed to take appropriate steps for substitution of the legal heirs of the deceased, thereby resulting in non-compliance with the Court’s order. Consequently, the substitution is now barred by limitation. 5. In view of the foregoing, the present Writ Petition is dismissed in default. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 03.06.2025 Shiksha SHIKSHA BINJOLA Digitally signed by SHIKSHA BINJOLA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3410ef86ae41ec9fbabcd5dba6b3a2c24b5aa08b 09c12f21822fbd40bf639b1c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=FD80A2D028949381C52796A542D7FF0A9 BED00E67B5283D205F18FE29BDF5DD9, cn=SHIKSHA BINJOLA Date: 2025.06.04 10:00:20 +05'30'