HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10512 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Abhilash Mishra, Advocate on behalf of the opposite party No.2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P., learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and perused the record. 3. This application has been filed for quashing the charge-sheet No.332 of 2009, dated 21.09.2009 filed in Case Crime No.408 of 2009, under Sections 406, 323, 504 I.P.C. Police Station-Talkatora, District Lucknow as well as summoning order dated 04.11.2009 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned counsel for opposite party No.2 jointly submitted that vide order dated 28.10.2025. a direction was given to the court concerned to verify the factum of compromise executed by the parties. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, learned court concerned had verified the contents of compromise. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for opposite party no.2 jointly submitted that the parties have entered into compromise, which has duly been verified by the court concerned vide report/order dated 11.11.2025. 6. Learned A.G.A. has fairly conceded that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the court concerned. 7. Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of decisions has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice as has been held in Gian Singh Vs Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashish Gulati, Abhedya Rajeev, Nida Navi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Abhilash Mishra Jeetu Singh @ Devendra Singh Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties. 8. In view of the aforesaid and the fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further, the matter has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the compromise, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 9. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed. The entire criminal proceedings arising out of charge-sheet No.332 of 2009, dated 21.09.2009 filed in Case Crime No.408 of 2009, under Sections 406, 323, 504 I.P.C. Police Station-Talkatora, District Lucknow as well as summoning order dated 04.11.2009 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI are hereby quashed. 10. Office is directed to communicate this order to learned trial Court, forthwith. December 16, 2025 Pks A482 No. 10512 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench