HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10765 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. The present application has been filed by the applicant seeking bail in Crime No. 177 of 2025 under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Nigohan, District Lucknow. Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the gang chart, two cases have been shown against the applicant, and in those cases, he has already been enlarged on bail. The bail orders have been filed as Annexure-3 and 4 to the bail application. There is no other criminal history of the applicant. It is further submitted that co-accused Mohit Kumar @ Mohit Rawat and Raj Kumar @ Lalchandra @ Lal Chandan have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide orders dated 29.10.2025 and 17.10.2025. He seeks parity with the said co-accused person. It is also submitted that the applicant is in custody since 7.10.2025, and in case he is granted the facility of bail, there is no apprehension of his fleeing from the course of justice. He undertakes to abide by all conditions that may be imposed by the Court below and to cooperate in the expeditious conclusion of the trial. It is also submitted that the applicant is ready to furnish an undertaking in terms of requirement of Section 19(4)(b) of U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rahul Kumar, Moni Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dheeraj Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but has not disputed the factual submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused- applicant. On due consideration to the anticipatory bail orders of the co-accused persons, named above, and the facts that in cases mentioned in the gang chart the applicant has been enlarged on bail; the applicant is languishing in jail since 7.10.2025; the co-accused Mohit Kumar and Raj Kumar have already been granted anticipatory bail, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed on the ground of parity. Let the applicant, Dheeraj Singh involved in the aforesaid FIR number be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in t. he like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (v) The applicant shall submit an undertaking on affidavit in terms of Section 19 (4) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 that he will not indulge in any case for or misuse the liberty of bail. (vi) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code (Now Section 269 of BNS). (vii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. (now BAIL No. 10765 of 2025 2 Section 84 BNSS) is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law under Section 174-A IPC (now Section 209 of BNS). It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. November 7, 2025 Madhu D.R/P.S BAIL No. 10765 of 2025 3 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench