HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 No. - 8 of 2025 Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. 1. Counsel for the appellant submits that on account of subsequent development, whereby application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ('the Act') has been decided, the present appeal, which arose out of order passed under Section 9 of the Act, has been rendered infructuous. 2. In view of the submission made, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. December 17, 2025 P.Sri./Harshita Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Rajesh Chaddha, Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava, Vibhanshu Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Sunil Kumar Singh, Aarohi Bhalla, Kartikeya Yadav (Jaspreet Singh,J.) (Arun Bhansali,CJ.) U.P. Electronics Corporation Ltd. through its Managing Director Ravi Ranjan .....Appellant(s) P.S. Global New Delhi through its Partner .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PUNEET SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench