2025:UHC:11581-DB SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS W PCRL/ 1 7 5 4 / 2 0 2 5 Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. Hon ’ble Su bh ash Upadh yay, J. 1. Mr. Aditya Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Additional Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Petitioner is running an Industrial Unit, which runs a Manufacturing Unit. According to petitioner, respondent nos. 4 & 5 are holding agitation in front of factory premises of petitioner, due to which the production in the Manufacturing Unit is affected. 4. The reliefs, sought in the writ petition, are as follows: - (i) Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents No. 1 to 3 to ensure that no protest, picketing, or demonstration takes place within 300 meters radius of the Petitioner’s factory premises, so as to unimpeded access to the premises and prevent obstruction to lawful business operations. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent No. 1 to 3 to provide adequate police protection to the Petitioner, its management, staff, and goods entering or existing the premises. (iii) Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent No. 1 to 3 to provide strict action against Mr. Lalit Kumar and all other persons named in the written complaint or involved in the unlawful protest under the relevant provision of the B.N.S. and other applicable laws. 2025:UHC:11581-DB (iv) To grant ad interim ex-parte stay thereby directing the respondents No. 1 to 3 to ensure that no protect, picketing, or demonstration takes place within 300 meters radius of the Petitioner’s factory premises, so as to ensure unimpeded access to the premises and prevent obstruction to lawful business operations during the pendency of the present writ petition. 5. Learned State Counsel has produced in Court the written instructions received from In-charge Inspector, Kotwali, Manglour, which are taken on record. Perusal of written instructions reveals that there was an Industrial unrest in Manufacturing Unit of petitioner; however, the unrest has now come to an end, after the Management entered into a settlement with the workers. The settlement was reportedly entered on 20.12.2025. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are certain persons, who are still creating disturbance. He submits that they be restrained from holding demonstration, within 150 meters of main gate of the factory premises. 7. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with a direction to Station House Office, Manglour, District Haridwar, not to permit any agitation, demonstration etc. within 150 meters of main gate of the Manufacturing Unit of petitioner. The ingress and egress to the Manufacturing Unit of the petitioner shall be left open and no one may be permitted to cause hindrance in the same. ( Su b h ash Up ad h y ay , J.) ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 24.12.2025 Aswal NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08 d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4 610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2025.12.24 00:40:04 -08'00' 2025:UHC:11581-DB