HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6976 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Sudhir Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Nayab Tehsildar, Shahganj, Tehsil - Bikapur, District - Ayodhya, to decide recall application dated 05.02.2024, filed for recall of order dated 30.01.2023, in Case No. 3935 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. T 202104230303935) - Shiv Kumari Vs. Ram Piyari, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Nayab Tehsildar, Shahganj, Tehsil - Bikapur, District - Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Nayab Tehsildar, Shahganj, Tehsil - Bikapur, District - Ayodhya, is directed to decide recall application dated 05.02.2024, filed for recall of order dated 30.01.2023, in Case No. 3935 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. T 202104230303935) - Shiv Kumari Vs. Ram Piyari, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 2, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Shiv Kumari .....Petitioner(s) Nayab Tehsildar Shahganj, Tehsil Bikapur, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench