RAMAWATI @ BHUNGA AND ANOTHER v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, DEVI PATAN MANDAL, GONDA AND OTHERS .
A227/6611/2025 · 2025-11-13
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174777 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174777 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6611 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Hom Narayan Awasthi, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Additional Commissioner, Devipatan Division, Gonda, to decide Revision/Case No. 1155 of 2024 (Computerized Case No. C 202408000001155) - Amirka Prasad and Others Vs. Ramawati @ Bhunga and Others, U/S 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Additional Commissioner, Devipatan Division, Gonda, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Additional Commissioner, Devipatan Division, Gonda, is directed to decide Revision/Case No. 1155 of 2024 (Computerized Case No. C 202408000001155) - Amirka Prasad and Others Vs. Ramawati @ Bhunga and Others, U/S 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of eight months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
November 13, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hom Narayan Awasthi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Ramawati @ Bhunga And Another .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner, Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda And Others . .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench