CHANDAN PATHAK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. U.P. PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. LKO.
WRIA/12801/2025 · 2025-11-04
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174772 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174772 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12801 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard petitioner in person and Mr. Ashwani Kumar Singh Rathore, learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to decide complaint dated 26.06.2025 preferred by petitioner.
3. Learned State Counsel at the very outset has raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of this petition in view of fact that petitioner does not have any statutory rights to seek writ of Mandamus as has been sought.
4. In view of the preliminary objection raised, petitioner in person seeks to pursue his complaint with the authorities concerned.
5. In view of such submissions, the petition is consigned to record.
November 4, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : In Person Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Chandan Pathak .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. U.P. Public Works Deptt. Lko. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench