Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174763 (ALL)

RAMCHANDRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. LKO.

BAIL/10467/2025 · 2025-10-29

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10467 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 372 of 2024, under Sections 103(1) of BNS, PS Makhi, District Unnao. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that the father of the informant had left home and subsequently his body was found in the mortuary. Apprehension was expressed that the applicant had committed the offence against the father of the informant. Subsequently, the informant himself has not supported the prosecution story. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 18.01.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant Ramchandra be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sagar Singh, Shri Ram Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ramchandra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 29, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 10467 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench