Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174760 (ALL)

BHUPENDRA SINGH v. STATE BANK OF INDIA THRU. CHAIRMAN MUMBAI MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

WRIA/12654/2025 · 2025-10-30

Shree Prakash Singh

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12654 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Saurabh Dwivedi, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record. Instant petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:- "I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the concern opposite parties to appoint the petitioner on the post of Armed Guard in the offices or Branches of the State Bank of India by the opposite parties at Lucknow, in the interest of justice. II. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the concern opposite parties to pay compensation of Rs.50,000/- for the mental harassment caused on part of the opposite parties to the petitioner, in the interest of justice." Learned counsel for the petitioner, after argument at length, submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court is pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the respondent no.2 within fifteen days and direct the respondent no.2 to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the submission aforesaid. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lalit Mohan Joshi, Kapil Mishra, Rajesh Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ankit Srivastava Bhupendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Bank Of India Thru. Chairman Mumbai Maharashtra And Another .....Respondent(s) Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move fresh representation before the respondent no.2/General Manager (HR), State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Lucknow within fifteen days and in case such representation is moved, the respondent no.2 is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within further period of two months. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. October 30, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 12654 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench