MOHD. SUHAIL AKHTAR ANSARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.DEPTT.OF BASIC EDU.LUKCNOW andORS
WRIA/6451/2016 · 2025-11-19
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174757 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174757 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 6451 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 19, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ghause Beg, P.S. Bajpai, Rakesh Kumar (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Mohd. Suhail Akhtar Ansari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Deptt.Of Basic Edu.Lukcnow Andors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench