KALAM MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
/10967/2025 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174732 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174732 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10967 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State-respondents. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue appropriate remedies that may be available to him under law.
Learned counsel for respondents has no objection to the prayer made by
learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. November 20, 2025 prateek Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Govind Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Kalam Mohammad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench