SANJAY KUMAR DARGI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY.NAGAR VIKAS SECTT.LUCKNOW AND ORS.
WRIA/24182/2017 · 2025-12-03
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174725 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174725 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 24182 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 3, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dilip Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ramesh Chandra Pandey (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Sanjay Kumar Dargi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Nagar Vikas Sectt.Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench