Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17471 (UTT)

ABHAY PRAKASH NARAYAN SAXENA v. MANOJ SINGHAL

WPMS/3539/2023 · 2025-11-27

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS W PMS 3 5 3 9 / 2 0 2 3 Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. Mr. A.S. Rawat, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Harsh Vardhan Dhanki and Mr. Imran Ali, Counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Mamta Bisht, Deputy AG, for the State. Ms. Sangeeta Adhikari Patni, Advocate, i/ b Mr. N.S. Pundir, Advocate for the respondent no. 2. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate, for the respondent no. 5. (2) Mr. A.S. Rawat, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner, makes a statement at the bar that the writ petition has become infructuous in view of subsequent events. (3) In view of the statement made by learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 2 7 .1 1 .2 0 2 5 Pr PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FCA58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2025.11.27 17:20:05 +05'30'