RUQAIYA BANO v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.BASIC EDU.GOVT.OF UP LKO.and ORS.
WRIA/13035/2016 · 2025-12-03
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174692 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174692 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13035 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State and Mr. Ravi Prakash, counsel for respondent no. 3 are present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 3, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Surendra Pratap Singh, Brijesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ajay Kumar, Ravi Prakash (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Ruqaiya Bano .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu.Govt.Of Up Lko.And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench