Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174684 (ALL)

SAPNA SINGH v. NAIB TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL PATTI, PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS

A227/6859/2025 · 2025-11-24

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6859 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the State-respondents to decide recall/restoration application dated 06.07.2024 filed by respondent No. 11 in case No. T202404040300879, U/S 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Sadre Alam & Sabre Alam Vs. Chakmarg & others), expeditiously. 4. It is urged that though the matter is being listed but for one reason or the other, the aforesaid case is not being decided. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent No. 1, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 6. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil - Patti, District - Pratapgarh is directed to decide Case No. 5871 of 2024 and computerized case No. T202402570405871 (Sapna Singh Vs. Kishun Kumari), U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of four Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Singh, Nandu, Saurabh Upadhyay, Upasana Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sapna Singh .....Petitioner(s) Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Patti, Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 8. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 9. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 24, 2025 Ravi/Anurag A227 No. 6859 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench