APHC010238482019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 10658/2019 Between: Mandadapu Rani, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESH KOTAMRAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA 2. M. VIDYASAGAR, ( STANDING COUNSEL FOR APGENCO ) 3. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI 4. CHALLA AJAY KUMAR 5. K ARUNA The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “.... to issue any writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the selection of the respondents 3 to 9 in violation of the addendum-I to notification dated 10.11.2017 as illegal, arbitrary consequently, set aside the said selection and consequently select the candidates by following the above said addendum-I and on the basis of the marks obtained by the petitioner consider her to the post of Junior Account Officer along with others.” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 2 4. Learned Standing Counsel for APGENCO appearing for respondents is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 10658 of 2019 26.03.2025 Mjl /*