HIMANSHU SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTTT. LKO.
BAIL/11113/2025 · 2025-11-18
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174668 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174668 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11113 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and Shri Suyesh Pradhan, learned counsel for the informant whose vakalatnama filed today is taken on record.
2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.430 of 2023 under Sections 302 and 506 IPC, P.S.- Pisawan, District-Sitapur.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present FIR was lodged by filing an application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. He further submits that similarly situated co-accused, namely, Shivanshu Singh has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 29.10.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.2031 of 2025. Therefore, applicant is also entitled to be released on bail.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering and adopting the reasoning as contained in the order dated 29.10.2025 coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 18.11.2023 and has no previous criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant- Himanshu Singh be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Punit Kumar Shukla, Priyanka Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Himanshu Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Depttt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 18, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 11113 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench